Jun 22
I commented on the rather naive article on Open source by Dr. Keith Sawyer. He had quoted Nicholas Carr’s article on open source. I have already rebutted Carr’s argument in my blog. So I posted the following comments.
Nicholas Carr’s argument is weak. I have already rebutted it in my blog. Check it out
http://www.krishworld.com/blog/open-source/nicholar-carr-has-got-it-wrong/
They removed it. I posted another comment asking for explanation. They removed it too. It is a shame that the so called liberal media doesn’t allow dissenting opinion and indulge in such creepy activities.
June 23rd, 2007 at 7:54 am
You need to summarize your argument in a few sentences instead of linking to your blog article, which obviously contains a large number of unnecessary words, such as “I am going to take his arguments and show how he has got it totally wrong. Since Mr. Carr is an influential writer, I feel that he should have avoided the stereotypes and misunderstandings about the open source process. I just hope that he sees this post, as a response to his article, and considers my arguments for its merit.” p.s. Archimerged tried to log in using http://archimerged.wordpress.com. That failed, while the same URL worked at http://www.openidenabled.com/
June 23rd, 2007 at 7:54 am
You need to summarize your argument in a few sentences instead of linking to your blog article, which obviously contains a large number of unnecessary words, such as “I am going to take his arguments and show how he has got it totally wrong. Since Mr. Carr is an influential writer, I feel that he should have avoided the stereotypes and misunderstandings about the open source process. I just hope that he sees this post, as a response to his article, and considers my arguments for its merit.” p.s. Archimerged tried to log in using http://archimerged.wordpress.com. That failed, while the same URL worked at http://www.openidenabled.com/
June 23rd, 2007 at 8:54 am
You need to summarize your argument in a few sentences instead of linking to your blog article, which obviously contains a large number of unnecessary words, such as “I am going to take his arguments and show how he has got it totally wrong. Since Mr. Carr is an influential writer, I feel that he should have avoided the stereotypes and misunderstandings about the open source process. I just hope that he sees this post, as a response to his article, and considers my arguments for its merit.”
p.s. Archimerged tried to log in using http://archimerged.wordpress.com. That failed, while the same URL worked at http://www.openidenabled.com/
June 23rd, 2007 at 9:25 am
1. Because you did it in your blog, posted a link to it. They took it as an attempt by someone to get a link to their blog. 2. Its normal for bloggers, but mainstream media wants you to rebut their arguments in their comment space, not in your blog. Blogger conventions (if it is a convention) are not that widely adopted yet.
June 23rd, 2007 at 10:25 am
1. Because you did it in your blog, posted a link to it. They took it as an attempt by someone to get a link to their blog.
2. Its normal for bloggers, but mainstream media wants you to rebut their arguments in their comment space, not in your blog. Blogger conventions (if it is a convention) are not that widely adopted yet.
June 23rd, 2007 at 11:33 am
Really doubtful you’ll post my response but too funny…
June 23rd, 2007 at 12:33 pm
Really doubtful you’ll post my response but too funny…